Today we are pleased to welcome a friend of Tuesday Serial to the blog: Alison Wells (self-publishing as A.B. Wells). She is in the midst of launching her novel “Housewife with a Half-Life” and came to the realization late in the process that it would have been advantageous to writing her novel as a serial instead of as a traditional format. She’s looking for input to help her incorporate these realizations into writing the sequel, so take a look and please comment. Welcome, Alison!
1: Serial writing would have helped me produce a complete project sooner.
I wrote much of Housewife with a Half-Life during the 50,000 word novel writing month NaNoWriMo, so producing a large quantity of work wasn’t a problem. However, because the focus was the word-count, I wrote the book in a piecemeal fashion and, in the traditional novel writing mode of ‘rough first draft’, revise, revise, copy-edit, I spent a lot of time later reworking. As a busy mother of four with many projects underway, I need to discipline myself to use the short amount of time I have daily in an effective manner. I’m at a stage in life where I want to produce finished quality material as soon as possible. I’m seeing now how serial writing might better achieve that than the traditional model.
As it turned out Housewife with a Half-Life is episodic. It takes the form of a quest where Housewife Susan Strong and her spaceman companion Fairly Dave follow a series of adventures building up to the grand resolution and then to a cliff hanger chapter that set up the sequel. Having read more about how serial fiction works, I can see how the process of writing serial fiction could have heightened the tension in my episodes by making me sharpen the transitions.
2: With serial writing, I could have avoided my tendency to use mushrooms (or lack of linear discipline).
During NaNoWriMo I tapped directly into the process of incubation; following the threads of ideas, jumping from scene to scene, and thus luxuriating in the hot-tub of my subconscious but without focusing on the trajectory. I worked on what I called mushrooms, allowing scenes to coalesce. This helped me get words on the page to build up to the word-count, but this is being a pantser at its most chaotic. It seems to me that the serial writer is the best kind of pantser, remaining open to surprise and innovation but moulding the mind into a linear storytelling discipline, the kind of discipline that is often required as a mother making up stories for young children. I love flowery language also, I’m the kind of person who can let themselves get taken over by so-called “purple prose” (Andrew Eckhart mentions this in his post as well) – ie, the kind of prose that runs off on its own journey, takes away from the clear narrative required by the reader and stops them getting at the story. If Housewife with a Half-Life had been done as a serial rather than a traditional book, these issues would have been resolved earlier in the writing process.
3: Serial fiction suits the self-publisher
For several reasons I outlined in my interview with Mariam Kobras, I decided to self-publish Housewife with a Half-Life as both ebook and POD paperback (it’s also being stocked in local booksellers). I’m currently on the initial publicity drive and it strikes me that if the book had been brought out as a serial, that would have been an integral element of the book’s own publicity machine. Having first thought I was pursuing the traditional model, I was hesitant about posting material from the book. But being involved in #fridayflash and Fictionaut, I know how peer feedback and reader engagement are crucial in enhancing work and creating visibility. I got Housewife with a Half-Life professionally edited at a structural and copy-editing level and would still go through a similar process to provide a quality self-published product. But as a self-publisher with my biggest home being on the web, I’d like new to find ways of reaching readers and improving my work.
Many of the more successful self-publishers have several books out including short volumes that are tasters of the writer’s work and can be offered more cheaply than the grand opus. I’m interested in exploring how serial writing can feed into and enhance the self-publishing model. I wanted to self-publish because I wanted to share writing and my way of looking at the world with readers. I also want to offer readers more in terms of freebies, spin-off volumes and so on. Additionally, I want to approach writing a book using a more dynamic, multi-layered, multi-media approach. It seems to me that serial fiction could, because of its bite sized nature, be more conducive to that.
Share your knowledge of serial fiction
In Housewife with a Half-Life the characters, adversaries and raison d’etre of a follow up are established. I’m almost ready to embark on this follow-up entitled The Meaning of Life is Monday. I’m wondering if Tuesday Serial writers have any suggestions as to how I might proceed with working on the project as a serial and how you have become a disciplined pantser rather than a chaotic one. I’d be grateful to hear your thoughts.
A.B. Wells is the mother of four children age 11 and under. London born, Kerry raised, she has lived in Bray, Co. Wicklow for many years. As Alison Wells her more literary writing has been shortlisted in the prestigious Bridport, Fish and Hennessy Awards and she’s been published or is about to be in a wide variety of anthologies and e-zines, including the Higgs Boson Anthology by Year Zero, Metazen, Eighty Nine, Deck the Halls and National Flash Fiction Day’s Jawbreakers. She recently won the fiction category of the Big Book of Hope ebook with a flash fiction medley and has a litfic novel “The Book of Remembered Possibilities” on submission. She blogs for the popular writing website Writing.ie and on her own website Head above Water.
I think of my serial novel as a rough first draft, basically a drawn-out Nanowrimo, since I am putting it up as I am writing it. While I try to plan a little ahead and I have an ending in mind, I am sure once I am done, there will be a lot of revisions needed. So, I'm not sure that a serial format has an inherent advantage in producing a project sooner or avoiding mushrooming, but it's whatever works best for each person.
I am new to Tuesday Serial, but I have serialized novels before. They were novels which were already written, though, and I feel like they were more of a "dry run." And that, I think, is the first bit of advice I would give to someone new to serializing: the more experience and resources you bring to the table, the better you will be at it. If you've even done non-fiction blog posts as a series, you will have some experience to help you with this. (For instance, ideas for interlinking posts to help the reader navigate.)
It sounds like you are ready to get started — you have produced on deadline for NaNo, you have the experience with online group support, and you have a story which is episodic.
And that was the thing that was critical to me. My story actually came from a lifetime of goofy ideas which have been knocking around in my head, like a running soap opera. When I decided to turn some of the stories into a real story, I used "The Serial" as a working title — not because I intended to serialize it, but because it resembled a serial.
Then when I wanted to do something to shake me up this summer, I realized that this story would be great for a serial.
You are correct about the self-discipline: it's really hard work. Because I want to keep the episodes very short (I'm aiming at 600 words, but not often hitting it), the story doesn't progress that far, so I'm doing two episodes a week. I'm also doing illustrations (just stylized chapter-head illos) and the discipline on THAT is doing great things for my illustration skills too.
The one thing I find is that ultra-short episodes make for a different kind of writing. I don't have time to dwell on things I usually dwell on. And they aren't things that I consider bad about my writing — sometimes I have to skip things that I consider to be the best thing I write. However, I'm meeting deadlines and getting the job done, like a pulp writer.
And… I intend to expand the story when I adapt it for an ebook. Not plot-wise, but just filling out the banter in dialog, the mood and atmosphere, adding nuance.
"I intend to expand the story when I adapt it for an ebook. Not plot-wise, but just filling out the banter in dialog, the mood and atmosphere, adding nuance."
I think the serial is very good for moving the plot along, but you don't have the time and space for a lot of description (at least if you want to keep the posts tight and concise), so this is my plan as well.
What works for a serial is episodic chunks. There doesn't have to be cliffhanger at the end of each episode, but a chapter with longer arc can seem abrupt if broken into 1500 word episodes.
Thanks so much for you comments. It seems that there's still plenty of scope for revision in serial writing and that the short chunks I'm used to in writing #fridayflash might work. How much do people know how your piece is going to end and does that affect how you roll out the plot as you go?
I don't get enough feedback to answer that question. When I look at the remarks on the blogs of others, and also talk to people who have followed serials… I find that there is no pat answer to that. It varies, and serialization is not widespread enough to see that many patterns.
At least, serialization of fiction. If you consider daily comic strips as being a kind of serial story — not just web comix, but old fashioned newspaper comics — I think we can see a model to help understand how mainstream audiences might look at serials. There's a lot more sense of "In the moment" with comics, which we don't get with fiction, generally.
IMHO, you should treat audience expectation like you do when they are reading a book, though. Sometimes foreshadowing increases anticipation. Sometimes you need to keep them in the dark for a surprise.
Thanks Camille, that's a really good point about the 'in the moment' of comics rather than fiction. I know that some writers have conducted experiments in audience participation as they write their books, a kind of choose your own adventure by jury which is a nice idea but I'm not sure how the product ends up. I guess in that scenario you could guide possible and equally enticing paths and let the readers responses sway you. All very interesting possibilities.